Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Dissent Dressing: The Colour and Fabric of Political Rage

Jo Coghlan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

What we wear signals our membership within groups, be theyorganised by gender, class, ethnicity or religion. Simultaneously our clothing signifies hierarchies and power relations that sustain dominant power structures. How we dress is an expression of our identity. For Veblen, how we dress expresses wealth and social stratification. In imitating the fashion of the wealthy, claims Simmel, we seek social equality. For Barthes, clothing is embedded with systems of meaning. For Hebdige, clothing has modalities of meaning depending on the wearer, as do clothes for gender (Davis) and for the body (Entwistle). For Maynard, "dress is a significant material practice we use to signal our cultural boundaries, social separations, continuities and, for the present purposes, political dissidences" (103). Clothing has played a central role in historical and contemporary forms of political dissent.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-11
JournalM/C Journal
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dissent Dressing: The Colour and Fabric of Political Rage'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this