Abstract
Guido Pennings’ views on favouring donor anonymity are well known. However we were very concerned at your decision to publish and then highlight his article Disclosure of donor conception, age of disclosure and the well-being of donor offspring (Pennings, 2017) which, in our view, fell significantly short of the academic rigour we expect of Human Reproduction and its peer review and editorial processes. The signatories to this letter come from the fields of academia, professional practice, parent/family/ donor-conceived support groups and donor registry services.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1534-1536 |
| Journal | Human Reproduction |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 25 May 2017 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Disclosure and donor-conceived children'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver