Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Disclosure and donor-conceived children

  • Marilyn Crawshaw
  • , Damian Adams
  • , Sonia Allan
  • , Eric Blyth
  • , Kate Bourne
  • , Claudia Brügge
  • , Anne Chien
  • , Antonia Clissa
  • , Ken Daniels
  • , Ellen Glazer
  • , Jean Haase
  • , Karin Hammarberg
  • , Hans van Hoof
  • , Jennie Hunt
  • , Astrid Indekeu
  • , Louise Johnson
  • , Young Kim
  • , Maggie Kirkman
  • , Wendy Kramer
  • , Ann Lalos
  • Charles Lister, Phyllis Lowinger, Erica Mindes, Jim Monach, Olivia Montuschi, Sheila Pike, Victoria Powell, Iolanda Rodino, Alice Ruby, Anne Margriet Schrijvers, Yukari Semba, Ruth Shidlo, Petra Thorn, Lois Tonkin, Marja Visser, Julia Woodward, Tewes Wischmann, Samantha Yee, Julianne E Zweifel

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Guido Pennings’ views on favouring donor anonymity are well known. However we were very concerned at your decision to publish and then highlight his article Disclosure of donor conception, age of disclosure and the well-being of donor offspring (Pennings, 2017) which, in our view, fell significantly short of the academic rigour we expect of Human Reproduction and its peer review and editorial processes. The signatories to this letter come from the fields of academia, professional practice, parent/family/ donor-conceived support groups and donor registry services.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1534-1536
JournalHuman Reproduction
Volume32
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 May 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Disclosure and donor-conceived children'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this