Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Directive speech acts in Malay (Bahasa Melayu): An ethnopragmatic perspective

Cliff Goddard

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Broadly speaking one can identify two approaches to the study of speech acts in cultural context: a mainstream approach known as 'contrastive pragmatics' and an alternative approach which I call 'ethnopragmatics'. Contrastive pragmatics (Blum-Kulka, Danet and Gherson 1985; Blum-Kulka et al 1989; Blum-Kulka and Kaspar 1993; among other works) assumes that certain speech-acts or speech-act types such as request, apology, and compliment - are found in all or most cultures, although they are "realised" differently from culture to culture. For example, requests may be realised with different degrees of directness or politeness, with an emphasis on positive or negative politeness, using different formal means of expression, e.g. imperatives, questions, modalised sentences, and so On. Many valuable studies have been produced in the contrastive pragmatics framework, but there are also some serious difficulties with its assumptions and methodology.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)113-143
    JournalCahiers de Praxématique
    Volume38
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - 2002

    Keywords

    • Discourse and Pragmatics

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Directive speech acts in Malay (Bahasa Melayu): An ethnopragmatic perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this