Abstract
A great body of literature suggests that the poor were better off before the microfinance sector's paradigm shift of the mid-1990s. The sector's 'dependent' constituents' focus changed in an effort to cope with the changes dictated by its 'controlling' constituents. This paper's key finding is that the not-for-profit sector, where beneficiaries' interests are at stake, and the corporate sector, where owners and management are separate, should undergo an externally dictated change only after passing through a regulating agency's scrupulous check, lest the change harm the sector's beneficiaries. The paper attempts to create awareness among policy-makers of the need to be thoughtful of the ultimate beneficiaries in similar cases of externally dictated organisational change.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 85-100 |
| Journal | Australasian Accounting Business and Finance Journal |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Publication status | Published - 2011 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 1 No Poverty
-
SDG 5 Gender Equality
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
Keywords
- Financial Institutions (incl Banking)
- Banking, Finance and Investment
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Dictating Change, Shouting Success: Where is Accountability?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver