Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Development of English question formation in the EFL context of China: Recasts or prompts?

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    This experimental classroom study investigates the effects of two feedback types on English question formation. Ninety Chinese learners were randomly assigned to either one of two experimental groups (recasts or prompts) or the control group. Between the pre- and posttests, the learners in the experimental groups received the assigned type of feedback that addressed their production of questions during task-based interaction. The effects of the feedback were measured by calculating whether there was an increase in production frequency of targeted question types. The results showed that (1) neither feedback type was effective in increasing the learners' production of Stage-5 questions, and (2) both feedback types were valuable in improving the learners' production of accurate questions, but recasts yielded a larger effect than prompts. These findings provide further evidence of feedback usefulness in L2 learning and shed light on English question formation via the pedagogical tool of corrective feedback.

    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationWidening Contexts for Processability Theory: Theories and issues
    EditorsAnke Lenzing, Howard Nicholas, Jana Roos
    Place of PublicationAmsterdam, Netherlands
    PublisherJohn Benjamins Publishing Company
    Pages327-348
    ISBN (Print)9789027262189, 9789027203984
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2019

    Publication series

    NameProcessability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research and Teaching
    PublisherJohn Benjamins Publishing Company
    Number7
    ISSN (Electronic)2210-6480

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Development of English question formation in the EFL context of China: Recasts or prompts?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this