Abstract
The extensively amended 'Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Legislation Amendment (Terrorism) Act 2003' (Cth) ('ASIO (Terrorism) Act 2003'), having first been introduced into Parliament in March 2002, was eventually passed after a Government 'compromise' aimed at achieving Opposition support. The final version of the legislation is remarkable not only because the Commonwealth Parliament has enacted a secret, renewable, incommunicado regime of detention and questioning of persons not suspected of any terrorism offence (for the purposes of the gathering of intelligence), but also because significant questions of constitutionality persist following the June 2003 amendments made to the Bill. This article commences with a discussion of several contextual matters providing important background for an examination of the Act's constitutionality.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 524-578 |
| Journal | University of New South Wales Law Journal |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Publication status | Published - 2004 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Constitutional Law
- International Law (excl. International Trade Law)
- Human Rights Law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Detaining Questions or Compromising Constitutionality? The ASIO Legislation Amendment (Terrorism) Act 2003 (Cth)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver