Abstract
The literature on the democratic legitimacy of judicial review and also on institutionalizing deliberative democracy neglects the possibility of employing juries rather than judges to determine bill-of-rights matters. This neglect is unfortunate, for there are findings emerging especially from deliberative polling that support the feasibility of such juries. Such feasibility would raise a new countermajoritarian concern with judicial review. The argument supporting this new concern also casts fresh light on the traditional countermajoritarian concern.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 327-359 |
| Journal | Oxford Journal of Legal Studies |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2010 |
Keywords
- Legal Theory, Jurisprudence and Legal Interpretation
- Constitutional Law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Deliberative Democracy and the Countermajoritarian Difficulty: Considering Constitutional Juries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver