Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Deliberative Democracy and the Countermajoritarian Difficulty: Considering Constitutional Juries

Eric Ghosh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The literature on the democratic legitimacy of judicial review and also on institutionalizing deliberative democracy neglects the possibility of employing juries rather than judges to determine bill-of-rights matters. This neglect is unfortunate, for there are findings emerging especially from deliberative polling that support the feasibility of such juries. Such feasibility would raise a new countermajoritarian concern with judicial review. The argument supporting this new concern also casts fresh light on the traditional countermajoritarian concern.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)327-359
JournalOxford Journal of Legal Studies
Volume30
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Keywords

  • Legal Theory, Jurisprudence and Legal Interpretation
  • Constitutional Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Deliberative Democracy and the Countermajoritarian Difficulty: Considering Constitutional Juries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this