Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Defending the Defensible: A Rebuttal of Scott Fitzpatrick's (2010) Critique of the AD 1300 Event Model with Particular Reference to Palau

Patrick Nunn, Rosalind Hunter-Anderson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    In a recent article [Journal of Pacific Archaeology, vol 1(2), 2010], Scott Fitzpatrick contends that the AD 1300 event model is unhelpful as a key to understanding environmental and societal change in the Pacific during the past 1500 years. We reject this contention on the grounds that there are ample and persuasive grounds for supposing otherwise. The AD 1300 event model proposes that climate change (especially cooling) and sea-level fall affected most of the Pacific Basin during the transition between the Medieval Warm Period and Little Ice Age, and that the impacts of these changes on food resources were so profound that they led to enduring impacts on human societies in this region, particularly Pacific Islands. We aver that the AD 1300 event model remains a powerful tool for understanding last-millennium environmental and societal change in the Pacific Islands and that all the charges Fitzpatrick levels against it can be readily dismissed.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)92-99
    JournalJournal of Pacific Archaeology
    Volume2
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 13 - Climate Action
      SDG 13 Climate Action

    Keywords

    • Archaeology of New Guinea and Pacific Islands (excl New Zealand)
    • Palaeoclimatology
    • Pacific Peoples Environmental Knowledge

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Defending the Defensible: A Rebuttal of Scott Fitzpatrick's (2010) Critique of the AD 1300 Event Model with Particular Reference to Palau'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this