Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Debating refugee credibility

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

A growing body of literature across multiple disciplines attests to the importance of credibility in the bureaucratic processes for assessing refugee claims. This includes in my own research, exploring the experiences asylum seekers have in these processes, the published reasons of decision-makers and the guidelines aimed at managing their assessments.

However, this focus on whether we should believe people who seek asylum is also popular in media reporting and political discourse. For instance, Australian Home Affairs Minister Peter Dutton recently commented that some refugees on Nauru who had fallen pregnant as a result of rape were "trying it on" by seeking medical transfer to Australia via new "medevac" legislation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-10
JournalLanguage on the Move
Volume2019
Publication statusPublished - 11 Jul 2019

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Debating refugee credibility'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this