Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Debating credibility: Refugees and rape in the media

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article explores public debates about credibility in media discourse regarding a Somali refugee who was raped on Nauru. Given the pseudonym “Abyan”, she was living on Nauru as a result of Australian refugee policy and was brought to Australia for medical assistance. Her treatment by the Australian authorities became the subject of debate and was widely discussed in the Australian media. Analyzing a corpus of media articles reporting and commenting on this debate, this article explores how the media’s representations of the key actors shape their credibility. Reflecting existing research, this article finds that Abyan’s experience is used to support broader policy arguments. Further, the discourse presents Abyan as a key speaker, despite her limited ability to defend her credibility. The article concludes that credibility remains an important theme in discourse on refugees and that power asymmetries hidden within this discourse create obstacles for those wishing to challenge it.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4-36
JournalAustralian Review of Applied Linguistics
Volume42
Issue number1
Early online date4 Jul 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Jul 2019

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Debating credibility: Refugees and rape in the media'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this