Abstract
In Moonlite, David Foster marshals his militant satirical forces against the ideological and historicist excesses of 'official' history, his farcical reconstruction of colonial history becoming a subversive deconstruction of the story of the past — a 'mythistorical', anti-imperial critique that demands a reviewing of history. Significantly, it is Foster's satirical treatment of history which makes Moonlite such a forceful critique; and to assess the novel as a satire involves the consideration of certain formal characteristics so far overlooked in the appraisal of Foster's most impressive achievement to date.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 71-88 |
| Journal | Westerly |
| Volume | 42 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - 1997 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'David Foster's Moonlite: Re-viewing history as satirical fable - towards a post-colonial past'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver