Abstract
In this article, I reframe the 'female circumcision controversy' 1928 - 1931, focusing on locating Ratna Kapur's 'erotic subject'. Kapur develops the terms 'sexual subaltern' and the 'erotic subject' in order to trouble the boundaries of, and ultimately expand the category of the legitimate, rights bearing subject (Kapur 2005). Searching for the voices of these disruptive subjects also compels fresh interrogations of the gendered, colonised subject.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 10-22 |
| Journal | Australasian Review of African Studies |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2014 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Cultural practice as resistance in the British colony of Kenya'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver