Abstract
This article considers whether criminal offenders in Australia are second-class citizens. Using TH Marshall’s seminal conception of citizenship, the article discusses various ways in which offenders’ civil, political and social rights are delimited in Australia. While acknowledging that the liberty of prisoners is curtailed – which is the defining and necessarily punitive feature of imprisonment – the article argues that the legal system goes further, imposing a range of collateral consequences on offenders that seriously infringe other fundamental rights. Using penological and liberal theories, consideration is given to the question of whether the impairment of offenders’ fundamental citizenship rights can be justified. It is argued that the impairment of rights discussed is not theoretically justifiable, and is arguably best explained as an anachronistic remnant of attainder.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 403-437 |
| Journal | Griffith Law Review |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2010 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Criminals and (Second Class) Citizenship: Twenty-First Century Attainder?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver