Abstract
This chapter compares specific crime prevention methods used within rural areas of four countries: the state of Victoria, Australia; Germany; South Africa; and England. In each of these countries, rurality is constructed as an idyllic space in which crime is perceived as an urban problem. However, rurality is also portrayed as a place where individuals are vulnerable or feel unsafe because of the lack of urban infrastructure and population density, and the population is socially separated from the urban. Following a review of the literature on rural crime prevention, the chapter will outline the methodology adopted for each of the four country cases. It will present the data collected from farmers regarding who they perceive to be responsible for crime prevention (themselves or police), their likelihood to adopt certain crime prevention measures and willingness to embrace new crime prevention technologies. It concludes with as assessment of existing and emerging crime prevention measures for farming properties.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Crime, Peoples and Places: Perspectives on Rural Safety and Justice |
| Editors | Ceccato, Vania and Harkness, Alistair |
| Place of Publication | Abingdon, United Kingdom |
| Publisher | Routledge |
| Pages | 275-289 |
| Edition | 1 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781032497983, 9781032497990, 9781003395522 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 10 Apr 2025 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Crime prevention practices: The cases of Australia, Germany, South Africa and England'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver