Abstract
Looking up 'creolization' on any data base, or doing a search at amazon.com or simple googling the term will show that it is more widely used outside linguistics than inside – especially in anthropology, sociology, history and literary studies. Jourdan (2001: 2903) notes that the term has been borrowed from linguistics where one its definitions is the creation of a new language out of contact between at least two different languages. Creolization in the sociocultural context usually refers to the creation of new aspects of culture as a result of contact between different cultures. In this column, I present some background information on what I'll call 'sociocultural creolization' and its links with linguistic creolization. Then I describe what I see as some of the differences between the sociocultural and linguistic approaches. I conclude with implications of these differences for the field of creolistics.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 141-166 |
| Journal | Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2005 |
Keywords
- Linguistic Structures (incl Grammar, Phonology, Lexicon, Semantics)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Creolization outside Creolistics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver