Abstract
The role of creativity in place development is contentious. Florida’s work on the creative class has achieved cult status among some academics, but is excoriated by others. I am one of those who are convinced of the large and growing role of creative people in economic and social development, but who dissents from major sections of Florida’s analysis, especially his profound urban bias. This article explains why I believe that creativity is crucial for regional development, a view that other academic geographers hold and explores the weaknesses of Florida’s urban bias. The first task is fundamental for an exploration of the latter.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 24-43 |
| Journal | International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue number | 1/2/3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2009 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
Keywords
- Economic Geography
- Urban and Regional Studies (excl Planning)
- Economic Development and Growth
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Creativity in rural development: an Australian response to Florida (or a view from the fringe)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver