Abstract
The authors regret to inform that in the previously published article there are two errors, one in Table 2 and another in Table 3. The corrections are as follows: 1) There is a change to the caption of Table 2. The current version reads 'The eleven SNPs identified.', it should read 'The eight SNPs identified.' 2) There is a correction to the information in Table 2. Previously in the last column of the bottom row a T appeared. This should be a dot, indicating the base is the same as that of the reference sequence (NC_001323), as appears in the revised Table 2 presented here. 3) There is a correction to the information in Table 2. In the row labelled ah4, the column representing base position 307 was shown as a dot in the original. This should have been a T. This change appears in the revised Table 3 presented here. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 3367-3368 |
| Journal | Journal of Archaeological Science |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2013 |
Keywords
- Archaeology of New Guinea and Pacific Islands (excl New Zealand)
- Archaeology
- Archaeological Science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum to "Mitochondrial DNA from 3000-year old chickens at the Teouma site, Vanuatu" [J. Archaeol. Sci. 37 (10) (2010) 2459-2468]'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver