Abstract
Until relatively recently the majority of large publicly listed UK companies have not produced annual environmental reports. Of particular note is the slow take-up of environmental reporting amongst the UK's top 350 companies, the FTSE 350. Using the results of a postal questionnaire, the reluctance of a majority of the FTSE 350 to voluntarily report is linked to 13 drawbacks. Results from non-reporting respondents to the questionnaire allowed the relative importance of these drawbacks to be placed in a ranked order. Senior management doubt over the advantages of reporting was shown to be the most important drawback, closely followed by the effort required for data collection. A comparison in the uptake of corporate environmental management practices (other than reporting) was also made amongst reporters and non-reporters. Reporters were shown to have a generally higher level of uptake, although company sector type and size was influential on environmental engagement overall.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 245-259 |
| Journal | Business Strategy and the Environment |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2008 |
Keywords
- Sustainability Accounting and Reporting
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Corporate Environmental Non-Reporting: a UK FTSE 350 Perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver