Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Contemporary Issues in Civil Service Management in South Asia: Principles and Practice in India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh

Habib Zafarullah, Abu Elias Sarker

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This chapter focuses on civil service management (CSM) in the three countries of South Asia - India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh - from a broad comparative perspective. The trajectory of the development of the civil services since colonial times is traced to illustrate how the structural, functional, and behavioral patterns were adopted or adapted after independence and to understand the impact of this inherited legacy on their CSM approaches. Premised on the social, cultural, and political context of CSM, differences and similarities among the three countries in terms of the politics-bureaucracy nexus, civil service classification, recruitment and selection, career management, and bureaucratic integrity are examined. The study shows that elitism, conservatism, and self-preservation that the colonial civil service had epitomized have endured, regardless of sporadic attempts towards reform. The emphasis on non-merit criteria in recruitment, promotion, postings, and transfer, the disconnect between training and promotion, and the cumbersome career management regulations along with politicization and venality adversely affect civil service performance and the delivery of public services.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Palgrave Handbook of the Public Servant
EditorsHelen Sullivan, Helen Dickinson, Hayley Henderson
Place of PublicationCham, Switzerland
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
Pages81-102
Edition1
ISBN (Print)9783030299804, 9783030299811, 9783030299798
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Contemporary Issues in Civil Service Management in South Asia: Principles and Practice in India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this