Abstract
This report outlines the results of an investigation into the History units and majors structure at the University of New England (UNE) as a response to the National Disciplinary Standards. The findings have been drawn from interviews with staff and analysis of Unit information and evaluations. The report includes a comparative analysis of other universities and their responses to national standards, and an explanation of two national bodies: Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency (TEQSA) and the Higher Education Standards Panel (HESP). Given the current uncertainty about these bodies and the impact on history in universities, I have made two recommendations. Firstly, the UNE History team: Begin a process of reshaping and articulation of learning outcomes in line with the national standards and secondly: Establish foundational, consolidation and capstone units. This report acknowledges that this is a significant undertaking at a time when staff are already overstretched; however, I would argue it is imperative History at UNE keeps pace with the disciplinary practices, builds upon current strengths and remains a competitive player in the field of history in higher education.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Place of Publication | Armidale, Australia |
| Publisher | University of New England |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781921597510 |
| Publication status | Published - 2013 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
Keywords
- Higher Education
- Education Assessment and Evaluation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Consolidating Strengths and Innovation: An Investigation of National Standards and Units in History at the University of New England'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver