TY - CHAP
T1 - Conclusions
AU - Kehoe, Thomas J
AU - Pickering, Michael G
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - The far-right political party Alternativ fur Deutschland (AID) gained international attention during the 2017 federal election in Germany by portraying itself as the protector of German culture in opposition to Islam. One AID poster showed the backs of two (presumably German) women in bikinis with the tag, "'Burkas?' We prefer bikinis" ("Burkas?" Wir steh'n auf Bikinis). Another more explicitly contrasted German culture against the so-called Islamic way of life. Over the image of a piglet was the question and answer: "'Islam?' It does not suit our kitchen" ("Der Islam?" Passt nicht zu unserer Kuche). Fear is evident in these bigoted appeals to ethno-cultural exclusivity, though the xenophobia inherent in such messages is partially masked by braggadocio. The AID was more assertively hateful in other posters, casting Islam as an invading force. In one, under a black and white picture of three women in burkas read the statement, "Stop Islamization" (Islamisierung Stoppen). But even such blunt characterization of otherness was not as dark as the portrayals of Muslims as a threat to the deeper ethnic character and cultural values of Germany. Over the picture of a smiling pregnant woman lying on her back was the question and answer, "'New Germans?' We do it ourselves" ("Neue Deusche?" Machen wir selber). Such messages accompanied demands for "Islamfreie Schulen!' (Islam-free schools!). To the AID, Muslims are a threat to German children, women, and the very ethno-cultural identity of the German nation.
AB - The far-right political party Alternativ fur Deutschland (AID) gained international attention during the 2017 federal election in Germany by portraying itself as the protector of German culture in opposition to Islam. One AID poster showed the backs of two (presumably German) women in bikinis with the tag, "'Burkas?' We prefer bikinis" ("Burkas?" Wir steh'n auf Bikinis). Another more explicitly contrasted German culture against the so-called Islamic way of life. Over the image of a piglet was the question and answer: "'Islam?' It does not suit our kitchen" ("Der Islam?" Passt nicht zu unserer Kuche). Fear is evident in these bigoted appeals to ethno-cultural exclusivity, though the xenophobia inherent in such messages is partially masked by braggadocio. The AID was more assertively hateful in other posters, casting Islam as an invading force. In one, under a black and white picture of three women in burkas read the statement, "Stop Islamization" (Islamisierung Stoppen). But even such blunt characterization of otherness was not as dark as the portrayals of Muslims as a threat to the deeper ethnic character and cultural values of Germany. Over the picture of a smiling pregnant woman lying on her back was the question and answer, "'New Germans?' We do it ourselves" ("Neue Deusche?" Machen wir selber). Such messages accompanied demands for "Islamfreie Schulen!' (Islam-free schools!). To the AID, Muslims are a threat to German children, women, and the very ethno-cultural identity of the German nation.
UR - http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/1124799549
UR - http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/1143488643
UR - https://www.bloomsbury.com/au/fear-in-the-german-speaking-world-1600-2000-9781350150478/
M3 - Chapter
SN - 9781350150478
SN - 9781350150485
SN - 9781350150492
SN - 9781350152533
SN - 1350152536
SN - 1350150487
SN - 1350150495
SN - 1350150479
T3 - History of Emotions
SP - 275
EP - 282
BT - Fear in the German-Speaking World, 1600-2000
A2 - J Kehoe, Thomas
A2 - G Pickering, Michael
PB - Bloomsbury Academic
CY - London, United Kingdom
ER -