Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparison of protective efficacy of manual and automated 'in ovo' vaccination against Marek's disease in broiler chickens

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articlepeer-review

Abstract

Automated 'in ovo' vaccination (IOJ) against Marek's disease in broiler chickens is now a routine practice in the poultry industry. This method deposits vaccine mostly into the extra-embryonic (EE) spaces around the embryo, principally the amnion. In earlier experiments of ours, manual EE (MEE) vaccine deposition has not produced good protection in contrast to the apparent efficacy of the automated 'in ovo' method. Two experiments are reported, one confirming this difference in protection and the other demonstrating that there are significant differences in the precise site of vaccine deposition between the two methods, with a higher incidence of allantoic deposition in the case of MEE (25.5%) compared to OIJ (5.7%). However, this finding alone cannot explain the difference in protection between the two methods. We suggest that different methods of vaccinal virus uptake from the amnion may be involved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)197-201
JournalProceedings of the Australian Poultry Science Symposium
Volume15
Publication statusPublished - 2003
EventAPSS 2003: 15th Annual Australian Poultry Science Symposium - Sydney, Australia
Duration: 10 Feb 200312 Feb 2003

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Animal Protection (Pests and Pathogens)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of protective efficacy of manual and automated 'in ovo' vaccination against Marek's disease in broiler chickens'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this