Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparative Effectiveness of Example-based Instruction and van Hiele Teaching Phases on Mathematics Learning

Saidat Adeniji, Penelope Baker

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

This article explores the effectiveness of the pedagogical practices associated with the cognitive load theory and the van Hiele theory, which are two theories from cognitivism and constructivism perspectives, respectively. Following a quasi-experiment, the quantitative analysis of 157 high school students' responses to pre, post, and retention tests revealed that the students taught with the van Hiele teaching phases performed significantly better at the post and retention tests. While the cognitive load theory intervention bridges the gap between low and high ability students, the van Hiele teaching phases is beneficial to both low and high performing students. These results have implications for mathematics teaching practices and learning.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationMathematical Confluences and Journeys: Proceedings of the 44th Annual conference of Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia
EditorsNoleine Fitzallen, Carol Murphy, Vesife Hatisaru, Nicole Maher
Place of PublicationAdelaide, Australia
PublisherMathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (MERGA)
Pages58-65
ISBN (Print)9781920846336
Publication statusPublished - 2022
EventMERGA 44: 44th Annual conference of Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia - University of Tasmania, Launceston, Australia
Duration: 3 Jul 20227 Jul 2022

Conference

ConferenceMERGA 44: 44th Annual conference of Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia
CityLaunceston, Australia
Period3/07/227/07/22

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative Effectiveness of Example-based Instruction and van Hiele Teaching Phases on Mathematics Learning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this