Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Commentary: Steroid Madness- has the dark side of anabolic-androgenic steroids (AAS) been over-stated?

Kyle J D Mulrooney, Katinka van de Ven, Jim McVeigh, Rick Collins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recently the journal Performance Enhancement & Health put out a call to produce a special issue on the dark side of human enhancement, including the use of legal and illegal substances, leading us to ponder whether the “dark side” of anabolic-androgenic steroids (from here on, “steroids”) has been overstated. In this commentary, we will briefly engage with this question by unpacking what we describe here as the “narrative of harm”, which tends to dominate discourses on steroid use in wider society. We then consider an alternative perspective on steroid use which focuses on the users’ experience and understanding, with particular attention to the role of pleasure. Finally, we conclude by exploring some of the negative policy consequences arising from the dominance of the “narrative of harm” and advance a regulatory approach grounded in rational and research informed discussions around both the pleasures and pains of steroid use. A more developed version of this argument can be found in the forthcoming collection Human Enhancement Drugs, published by Routledge in 2019 (Mulrooney, van de Ven, McVeigh, & Collins, 2019).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)98-102
JournalPerformance Enhancement & Health
Volume6
Issue number3-4
Early online date19 May 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Commentary: Steroid Madness- has the dark side of anabolic-androgenic steroids (AAS) been over-stated?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this