Abstract
Cognitive-Behaviour Therapy (CBT) is increasingly being considered the psychological treatment of choice for problem gamblers. A number of reviews have reported overall positive outcomes in both randomized controlled and naturalistic trials. There is also dissenting evidence that CBT may, in fact, be no better than other talking therapies or indeed no treatment. Such evidence is driven by research using limited methodologies. However, such criticism cannot be ignored. This paper will present an overview of the multitude of CBT approaches being offered around the world. Common elements of all approaches will be examined and the possibility of a unified model suggested. This standardization of CBT for problem gambling may provide a more consistent approach internationally and thus give greater weight to the overall efficacy of CBT.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Publication status | Published - 2011 |
| Event | NAGS 2011: 21st Annual Conference of the National Association for Gambling Studies Australia - Melbourne, Australia Duration: 23 Nov 2011 → 25 Nov 2011 |
Conference
| Conference | NAGS 2011: 21st Annual Conference of the National Association for Gambling Studies Australia |
|---|---|
| City | Melbourne, Australia |
| Period | 23/11/11 → 25/11/11 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Mental Health Nursing
- Mental Health
- Health, Clinical and Counselling Psychology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Cognitive-Behaviour Therapy for problem gamblers: Do we need a unified model?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver