Abstract
Dissatisfaction with the 'corporate' model for university governance, a model advocated by both sides of the Australian parliament and adopted by Australian universities over the past two decades, prompted the Australian Vice-Chancellors' Committee (AVCC) in 2003 to suggest an alternative 'trusteeship' model. The paper discusses how this model differs from the traditional 'collegial' and 'corporate' models in a number of key areas and attempts to determine whether good reasons exist to justify changing from the current 'corporate' style to a 'trusteeship' form of governance.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 13-29 |
| Journal | Higher Education Research and Development |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2007 |
Keywords
- Policy and Administration
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Changing patterns of governance for Australian universities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver