Abstract
A, a pedestrian using a public right of way, is injured by the collapse of a bridge constructed by X Ltd on land belonging to Y, who commissioned the construction, on the basis of a plan drawn up by architect Z, whom Y also commissioned directly. It transpires that Z's plan was defective and caused the collapse. Y incurs the cost of instructing a different architect to redesign the bridge. Under the terms of its initial engagement, X Ltd is obliged to construct the new bridge for no additional remuneration.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages | 43-70 |
| Publication status | Published - 2013 |
| Event | WTLS Conference 2013: Inaugural Meeting and 1st Academic Conference of the World Tort Law Society - Harbin, China Duration: 14 Sept 2013 → 15 Sept 2013 |
Conference
| Conference | WTLS Conference 2013: Inaugural Meeting and 1st Academic Conference of the World Tort Law Society |
|---|---|
| City | Harbin, China |
| Period | 14/09/13 → 15/09/13 |
Keywords
- Tort Law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Case III: Bridge Collapse'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver