Abstract
Discussions with farmers, weeds officers and managers, and environmentalists suggest that there is a consensus about the institutional arrangements for weeds management, reflected in statements like: 'there is never enough money' or 'too much money gets wasted', 'the laws do not do what they are meant to', 'lots of committees, too little real action', 'landowners are not committed/not equipped to do what they must' and 'no-one values the work we do'. However whilst marked institutional improvement is needed to weed management institutions, specific reform proposals are largely missing. This paper explores why this may be the case, what types of reform may be possible, and presents a proposal for pursuing reform.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Proceedings of the 16th NSW Weeds Conference |
| Editors | Rod Ensbey |
| Place of Publication | Australia |
| Publisher | Weed Society of New South Wales |
| Pages | 36-43 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781742562117 |
| Publication status | Published - 2011 |
| Event | NSW Weeds 2011: 16th Biennial New South Wales Weeds Conference 2011: Making a difference - from Country to Coast - Coffs Harbour, Australia Duration: 18 Jul 2011 → 21 Jul 2011 |
Conference
| Conference | NSW Weeds 2011: 16th Biennial New South Wales Weeds Conference 2011: Making a difference - from Country to Coast |
|---|---|
| City | Coffs Harbour, Australia |
| Period | 18/07/11 → 21/07/11 |
Keywords
- Environmental and Natural Resources Law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Can anything be done about the institutions that limit weeds management?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver