Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Bull's-eye, Agency, and the Species Divide in 'Oliver Twist': a Cur's-Eye View

  • Jennifer McDonell (Editor)

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In a bleak moment in 'Oliver Twist', the narrator reflects satirically on the competition for sustenance that preoccupied Thomas Malthus and his followers. Mrs Sowerberry, wife of the undertaker to whom Oliver is apprenticed, feeds Oliver with scraps that were set aside for her dog, Trip. Addressing the reader, Dickens asks the "well-fed" proponents of Britain's controversial 1834 Poor Law Amendment Act and the system of union workhouses it inaugurated, to witness the spectacle of Oliver tearing at Trip's leftovers like a dog "with all the ferocity of famine" ... The figurative logic of this passage depends on a conception of what Anat Pick (2011) has termed creatureliness, a condition shared by both human beings and dogs. Stray children and women, like dogs, are shown in the novel to be equally vulnerable to violation by others: they are subjected to various forms of imprisonment, bodily harm, and death without recourse to social justice, and have a particular interest in food.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAnimals in Victorian Literature and Culture: Contexts for Criticism
EditorsLaurence W Mazzeno, Ronald D Morrison
Place of PublicationLondon, United Kingdom
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
Pages109-128
Edition1
ISBN (Print)9781137602190, 9781137602183
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Publication series

NamePalgrave Studies in Animals and Literature

Keywords

  • British and Irish Literature

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bull's-eye, Agency, and the Species Divide in 'Oliver Twist': a Cur's-Eye View'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this