Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Broadening the scope of empirical studies to answer persistent questions in landscape-moderated effects on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning

  • David J Perovic
  • , Sagrario Gámez-Virués
  • , Douglas A Landis
  • , Teja Tscharntke
  • , Myron P Zalucki
  • , Santiago Saura
  • , Michael J Furlong
  • , Nicolas Desneux
  • , Andrea Sciarretta
  • , Niko Balkenhol
  • , Jason M Schmidt
  • , Pasquale Trematerra
  • , Catrin Westphal

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite a developing understanding of how landscape level processes moderate biodiversity patterns and ecosystem functioning, key questions remain unresolved, therefore limiting our ability to manage for biodiversity conservation and ecosystem functioning at the most appropriate scales. These questions have remained unanswered because studies in agricultural landscapes generally over-emphasize alpha diversity within managed land uses, and are focused at scales that are irrelevant to species studied. We argue that the key to resolving unanswered questions in landscape-moderated effects on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning lies in establishing the distribution of available species and functions across the landscape and between land uses, and in understanding how this distribution of species varies with changing landscape context. We emphasize the need for studies that empirically test the mechanisms underpinning landscape-moderated effects on biodiversity and ecosystem function and link these with ecosystem service delivery. We facilitate this approach by outlining the empirical investigations that will lead to a better understanding of biodiversity patterns and ecosystem functioning at the landscape scale, and we highlight statistical approaches to support these different approaches to sampling. Our paper is divided in four sections: (A) we identify where and why gaps exist in our mechanistic understanding of landscape level processes, by reviewing current hypotheses" (B) we outline why, and how, landscape level research would benefit from shifting the focus to the distribution and partitioning of species and functions within a landscape" (C) we outline why, and how, larger scale processes, such as dispersal and meta-population dynamics need to be addressed in a more interactive fashion" and finally, (D) we round out by highlighting the experimental settings where landscape effects most urgently need testing.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAdvances in Ecological Research
EditorsDavid A. Bohan, Alex J. Dumbrell, and, Adam J. Vanbergen
Place of PublicationUnited Kingdom
PublisherElsevier Ltd
Pages109-131
Volume65
Edition1
ISBN (Print)9780323915038
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Dec 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 15 - Life on Land
    SDG 15 Life on Land

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Broadening the scope of empirical studies to answer persistent questions in landscape-moderated effects on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this