Abstract
Land clearance regulations aim to reduce the loss of native vegetation and therefore also reduce land degradation, the enhanced greenhouse effect and threats to biodiversity. An assessment of the success of such laws is long overdue, if the aims of the regulations are to be ultimately achieved. Insufficient monitoring and enforcement are problems frequently encountered in the regulatory field in general, perhaps because of administrative reluctance to interfere with behaviour which is otherwise beneficial (such as clearance for agriculture) and electorally sensitive. Remote sensing is presently employed in the monitoring of land cover change for data collection purposes but is under-utilised in the regulatory field, particularly in the forensic realm. Preliminary investigations suggest:
- a lack of systematic monitoring or at least data-sharing between agencies mapping landcover change and those responsible for enforcing land management regulations; and
- an agency reluctance to refuse permits, to prosecute, and/or to prefer counterproductive revegetation works to preservation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | SIRC 2000: The evocation of spatial knowledge (proceedings of the 12th Annual Colloquium of the Spatial Information Research Centre) |
| Publication status | Published - 2000 |
| Event | SIRC 2000: 12th Annual Colloquium of the Spatial Information Research Centre - University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand Duration: 17 Aug 2014 → 22 Aug 2014 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 15 Life on Land
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Big Brother and The Law of the Land: The Role of Satellite Surveillance and GIS in the Regulation of Land Clearance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver