Abstract
The imminent arrival of the Second Machine Age (2MA) will usher in an era of unprecedented economic and social turmoil which is likely to rewrite, over the next quarter century, the structure and function of cities at up to 4 times the pace of the industrial revolution, which itself transformed cities in the two centuries or so following 1750. Events will be driven not just by a raft of impending technologies and the fluidity with which they can be blended, integrated or fused into new products, services and lifestyles. As the recent intergenerational report and others like it have concluded, turmoil will be further exacerbated by changing demographic structures and migration patterns, global economic engagement - including both trade and finance, government budgetary crises, the increasingly fluid nature of work and social networking, and shifting home-work relationships and travel patterns, among many other things. Alas, such dynamism appears likely to hit a wall of urban inflexibility. Our sclerotic cities appear ill-suited to a world of rapid change for all manner of reasons, many planning related. For example, most planning systems arguably privilege the preferences of fearful incumbent residents over the preferences of outsiders. Excessive reverence for urban heritage stultifies imaginative proposals for badly needed higher density living spaces. Stretched public finances delay contemporary infrastructure provision. Our state and federal fiscal settings further ossify urban form in a variety of ways. Moreover, how can we conduct worthwhile long-term strategic planning when we can hardly conceive the configuration of fast-moving economy and society as little as 5 years from now? In short, many of our urban management procedures appear as an increasingly bureaucratic and conservative bulwark against imminent change at the same time as we need them to become imaginatively flexible and adaptive. How, then, can urban planning recapture the glory days of a century or so ago when it was in the vanguard of reimagining cities for the first machine age?
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | State of Australian Cities Conference 2015: Refereed Proceedings |
| Editors | Paul Burton, Heather Shearer |
| Place of Publication | Gold Coast, Australia |
| Publisher | Griffith University |
| Pages | 1-8 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781925455038 |
| Publication status | Published - 2015 |
| Event | SOAC 2015: 7th State of Australian Cities National Conference - QT, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia, Gold Coast, Australia Duration: 9 Dec 2015 → 11 Dec 2015 |
Conference
| Conference | SOAC 2015: 7th State of Australian Cities National Conference |
|---|---|
| City | Gold Coast, Australia |
| Period | 9/12/15 → 11/12/15 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 15 Life on Land
Keywords
- Urban Analysis and Development
- History and Theory of the Built Environment (excl. Architecture)
- Land Use and Environmental Planning
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Land-Use Planning in the Second Machine Age'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver