Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Attitudes to the Iraq war and mandatory detention of asylum seekers: Associations with authoritarianism, social dominance, and mortality salience

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Attitudes to the Iraq war and mandatory detention of asylum seekers were investigated for relationships with right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) and social dominance orientation (SDO), and for mortality salience effects predicted by terror management theory. Participants were 238 men and women, 18 - 65 years old, mainly Australian public servants who completed an attitudes survey. The survey allowed for a random allocation to one of four mortality salience manipulations: thoughts about death, thoughts about a terrorist attack, thoughts about voting, and no intervention. Support for Australia's involvement in the Iraq war and mandatory detention of asylum seekers was related to higher RWA and SDO, and lower levels of education but there was no statistically significant effect of mortality salience. The results have implications for understanding the value bases of social and political attitudes and for future investigations in this area.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)70-77
JournalAustralian Journal of Psychology
Volume59
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • Social and Community Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Attitudes to the Iraq war and mandatory detention of asylum seekers: Associations with authoritarianism, social dominance, and mortality salience'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this