Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Assessing Statistical Literacy: A Question of Interpretation?

Rosemary Anne Callingham

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

    Abstract

    Current school curriculum documents stress the need for assessment to support learning. Teachers use assessment information to infer students' development and plan appropriate intervention. In order to do this, a framework is needed within which the assessment can be developed and interpreted, and a suitable task is required to obtain the necessary information about students' performances. The responses of 586 students to performance assessment tasks developed for the purpose of assessing a numeracy construct, rather than statistical understanding, were analysed against a previously identified hierarchy of Statistical Literacy. The findings suggest that the tasks provided reliable and interpretable evidence of performance in Statistical Literacy, using a classroom-based process rather than a traditional test.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationWorking Cooperatively in Statistics Education: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Teaching Statistics (ICOTS-7)
    EditorsAllan Rossman, Beth Chance
    Place of PublicationSalvador, Brazil
    PublisherInternational Association for Statistical Education (IASE) & International Statistical Institute (ISI)
    Pages1-6
    ISBN (Print)9073592240, 9789073592247
    Publication statusPublished - 2006
    EventICOTS 7: 7th International Conference on Teaching Statistics - Salvador, Brazil
    Duration: 2 Jul 20067 Jul 2006

    Conference

    ConferenceICOTS 7: 7th International Conference on Teaching Statistics
    CitySalvador, Brazil
    Period2/07/067/07/06

    Keywords

    • Mathematics and Numeracy Curriculum and Pedagogy

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing Statistical Literacy: A Question of Interpretation?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this