Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Assessing distress in caregivers of people with a traumatic brain injury (TBI): a psychometric study of the Head Injury Behaviour Scale

Hamish P D Godfrey, Mairead A Harnett, Robert G Knight, Nigel Vincent Marsh, Denyse A Kesel, Fiona M Partridge, R Heidi Robertson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    25 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This study examined the psychometric properties of the Head Injury Behaviour Scale (HIBS) using responses from 242 caregivers. The HIBS is a 20-item, scale describing common behavioural problems following traumatic brain injury (TBI), which are typical of dysexecutive syndrome. A principal components analysis was conducted on caregiver distress ratings for the 20 items comprising the HIBS and produced a two-factor solution with 10 items loading on each factor. Consequently, two sub-scales were derived and labelled Emotional Regulation and Behavioural Regulation. The sub-scales were found to have good internal-consistency reliability. It is suggested that the Emotional Regulation sub-scale assesses behaviours reflecting impaired emotional control, occurring during interactions with caregivers. The Behavioural Regulation sub-scale assesses problems typical of dysexecutive syndrome, but which carry less emotional valence for caregivers. The clinical implications of these findings are discussed and normative data provided for the two sub-scales.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)427-435
    JournalBrain Injury
    Volume17
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2003

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Keywords

    • Health, Clinical and Counselling Psychology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing distress in caregivers of people with a traumatic brain injury (TBI): a psychometric study of the Head Injury Behaviour Scale'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this