Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Anti-realist assumptions and challenges in philosophy of mind

Drew Michael Khlentzos

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearch

Abstract

The plausibility of Naturalism - the view that the mind is a purely natural phenomenon that can be explained scientifically (if explained at all) - is a hotly contested topic in cognitive science, as every philosopher and cognitive scientist knows. It is not widely recognised, however that some of the more popular arguments against naturalism rest upon anti-realist metaphysical assumptions. This is a problem since the most plausible defences of naturalism presuppose a realist metaphysics. In this chapter, I shall chart one of these anti-realist assumptions and show how it features as a crucial premise in a leading anti-naturalist argument, the Knowledge Argument.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationMental States
EditorsAndrea C. Schalley, Drew Khlentzos
Place of PublicationAmsterdam, Netherlands
PublisherJohn Benjamins Publishing Company
Pages213-232
Volume1: Evolution, function, nature
Edition1
ISBN (Print)9789027231024
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Publication series

NameStudies in Language Companion Series (SLCS)
Number92

Keywords

  • Philosophy of Cognition

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Anti-realist assumptions and challenges in philosophy of mind'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this