Abstract
Various models were used to extract spatial effects from microarray data. Large discrepancies between the rankings of genes for the different methods were found, due to the roughness of the signal. Models assuming separability and autocorrelation did not perform as well as wavelets because the data were fractal in dimension, so assumptions underlying those models were violated.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics |
| Editors | AAABG: Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding, Genetics |
| Place of Publication | Collingwood, Australia |
| Pages | 262-265 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Publication status | Published - 2005 |
| Event | AAABG 2005: 16th Conference of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics - Noosa Lakes, Australia Duration: 25 Sept 2005 → 28 Sept 2005 |
Conference
| Conference | AAABG 2005: 16th Conference of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics |
|---|---|
| City | Noosa Lakes, Australia |
| Period | 25/09/05 → 28/09/05 |
Keywords
- Animal Breeding
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Analysis of microarrays incorporating adjustments for spatial effects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver