Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

An experimental analysis of assessor specific bias in a programming assessment in multi-assessor scenarios utilizing an eye tracker

  • Tanmoy Debnath
  • , Manoranjan Paul
  • , Subrata Chakraborty
  • , Pallab Kanti Podder
  • , Raj Gururajan
  • , Abdul Hafeez-Baig

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

Abstract

It has been experienced and reported by academic institutions around the globe that marking of most subject’s assessment scripts vary when different assessors are utilized for a given subject. To understand the difference, we capture and analysis cognitive response of assessors through the visual pattern while they are marking the scripts. For this, a Java programming assessment from a real life university examination is marked by independent assessors. The assessors marked the scanned assessment scripts on a computer screen in front of an Eye tracker machine and their eye gaze data were recorded real time. Data indicate that different assessors marked the same answer script differently and their visual pattern are also varied although they were given the exact same instructions which demonstrates bias to a degree. For quality marking, several findings including the number of assessors needed are also presented in this manuscript.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationLondon International Conference on Education (LICE- 2016)
Place of PublicationUnited Kingdom
PublisherLondon International Conference on Education (LICE)
Pages135-141
ISBN (Print)9781908320766
Publication statusPublished - 2016
EventLICE 2016: London International Conference on Education - Heathrow Windsor Marriott Hotel, London, United Kingdom
Duration: 14 Nov 2016 → 17 Nov 2016

Conference

ConferenceLICE 2016: London International Conference on Education
CityLondon, United Kingdom
Period14/11/16 → 17/11/16

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An experimental analysis of assessor specific bias in a programming assessment in multi-assessor scenarios utilizing an eye tracker'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this