Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

An assessment of the taxonomic status of wild canids in south-eastern New South Wales: phenotypic variation in dingoes

Cameron G Radford, Mike Letnic, Melanie Fillios, Mathew S Crowther

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    13 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In Australia, the genetic integrity of dingoes ('Canis lupus dingo') is threatened through hybridisation with feral dogs and consequently the identification of the modern 'pure' dingo is ambiguous. There are no accurate classification techniques for dingoes and dingo-dog hybrids in the wild. Genetics, skull morphology and visual assessment are methods currently used, but they often yield contrasting results. We tested skull morphological and visual assessment methods for classifying wild canids in south-eastern New South Wales and examined temporal and geographic trends in skull morphology. Published equations based on discriminant functions revealed varying percentages of dingoes, dogs and their hybrids over time, and did not yield similar results to visual assessment methods. Skull characteristics generally became larger over time but have recently stabilised. Changes in the morphology of the molars were consistent with the occurrence of hybridisation with dogs. Geographic variation was apparent and consistent with Bergmann's Law, with skulls increasing in size with altitude. This study highlights the importance for improved classification methods of wild canids and the importance of considering geographical variation in morphological studies.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)73-80
    JournalAustralian Journal of Zoology
    Volume60
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Keywords

    • Population Ecology
    • Zoology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'An assessment of the taxonomic status of wild canids in south-eastern New South Wales: phenotypic variation in dingoes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this