Abstract
The road of privatisation of government assets is littered with the debris of mishaps and oversights. One clear illustration is the history and effect of the sale of the Government Printing Office (GPO) in 1990. Within the sale process there was a failure to ensure adequate consideration of the policy implications from an important perspective, namely the effect of privatising the means of promulgation of the normative materials of the state. Furthermore, there was no inquiry into the dubious assumptions made as to Crown Copyright in legislation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 493-529 |
| Journal | New Zealand Law Review |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Publication status | Published - 1998 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Acts of Parliament: Privatisation, Promulgation and Crown Copyright - is there a Need for a Royal Royalty?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver