Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Acts of Parliament: Privatisation, Promulgation and Crown Copyright - is there a Need for a Royal Royalty?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The road of privatisation of government assets is littered with the debris of mishaps and oversights. One clear illustration is the history and effect of the sale of the Government Printing Office (GPO) in 1990. Within the sale process there was a failure to ensure adequate consideration of the policy implications from an important perspective, namely the effect of privatising the means of promulgation of the normative materials of the state. Furthermore, there was no inquiry into the dubious assumptions made as to Crown Copyright in legislation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)493-529
JournalNew Zealand Law Review
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 1998

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Acts of Parliament: Privatisation, Promulgation and Crown Copyright - is there a Need for a Royal Royalty?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this