Abstract
Recently, Brent Nongbri has proposed that British Library Papyrus 2053 came from a codex and not a roll. His primary concern is codicology and he pays no attention to scribal tendencies, including the implications of the palaeographical characteristics of the hand. In a careful reassessment that takes into consideration codicology, palaeography, scribal tendencies, and the physical condition of the papyrus itself, Nongbri's argument is found to be flawed in a number of ways which speak directly to the possible origins of BL Pap. 2053. All indications are that a third-century Christian used the back of a roll containing Exodus to produce a copy of Revelation for 'private' use.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 35-44 |
| Journal | Buried History |
| Volume | 53 |
| Publication status | Published - 2017 |
Keywords
- Christian Studies (incl. Biblical Studies and Church History)
- Historical Studies
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A reused roll or a 'curious Christian codex'? Reconsidering British Library Papyrus 2053 (P.Oxy. 8.1075 + P.Oxy. 8.1079)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver