Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A reused roll or a 'curious Christian codex'? Reconsidering British Library Papyrus 2053 (P.Oxy. 8.1075 + P.Oxy. 8.1079)

  • Scott Charlesworth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Recently, Brent Nongbri has proposed that British Library Papyrus 2053 came from a codex and not a roll. His primary concern is codicology and he pays no attention to scribal tendencies, including the implications of the palaeographical characteristics of the hand. In a careful reassessment that takes into consideration codicology, palaeography, scribal tendencies, and the physical condition of the papyrus itself, Nongbri's argument is found to be flawed in a number of ways which speak directly to the possible origins of BL Pap. 2053. All indications are that a third-century Christian used the back of a roll containing Exodus to produce a copy of Revelation for 'private' use.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)35-44
JournalBuried History
Volume53
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • Christian Studies (incl. Biblical Studies and Church History)
  • Historical Studies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A reused roll or a 'curious Christian codex'? Reconsidering British Library Papyrus 2053 (P.Oxy. 8.1075 + P.Oxy. 8.1079)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this