Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A Mechanistic Analysis of Wetland Biogeochemistry in Response to Temperature, Vegetation, and Nutrient Input Changes

  • Chiara Pasut
  • , Fiona H M Tang
  • , Federico Maggi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

<p>Wetlands represent the most significant natural greenhouse gas (GHG) source and their annual emissions tightly depend on climatic and anthropogenic factors. Biogeochemical processes occurring in wetlands are still poorly described by mechanistic models and hence their dynamic response to environmental changes are weakly predicted. We investigated wetland GHG emissions, relevant electron acceptors and donors concentrations, and microbial composition resulting from changes in temperature, CH<sub>4</sub> plant uptake efficiency, and SO<sup>2−</sup><sub>4</sub> deposition using a mechanistic biogeochemical model (here called BAMS3) that integrates the carbon (C), nitrogen (N), and sulfur (S) cycles. Parameters constraining the coupled C-N-S cycles were retrieved from controlled experiments and were validated against independent field data of CH<sub>4</sub> emissions, and CH<sub>4</sub>(aq) and SO<sup>2−</sup><sub>4</sub> concentration profiles in a wetland in southern Michigan, USA (Shannon & White, 1994, <a href="http://hdl.handle.net/102.100.100/236252? index=1">http://hdl.handle.net/102.100.100/236252? index=1</a>). We found that +1.75 <sup>◦</sup>C increase in temperature leads to 22% and 30% increment in CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions, respectively. A decrease in the CH<sub>4</sub> plant uptake efficiency causes the prevalent CH<sub>4</sub> emission pathway to become diffusion mediated and resulted in 50% increase in the daily average CH<sub>4</sub> emissions. Finally, a decreasing SO<sup>2−</sup><sub>4</sub> deposition rate can increase CH<sub>4</sub> emissions up to 5%. We conclude that the increasing GHG emissions from wetlands is a result of both environmental and anthropogenic causes rather than global warming alone. An increase in model complexity does not necessary improve the estimation of GHG emissions but it aids interpretation of intermediate processes to a greater detail.</p> <p>Plain Language Summary</p> <p>Wetlands are the largest natural source of greenhouse gasses; hence, climate change and human development have become a major concern for the conservation of these ecosystems. In this study, we explore the effect of rising temperature, plants community, and changes in nutrient input rate on the emission rate and quality in a wetland. The assessment was conducted using a mechanistic model that accounts for carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur cycles on test scenarios. The model was initially tested on field data of a wetland in southern Michigan, and then used for scenarios predictions. Results suggest that increasing the average soil temperature leads to a substantial increase in greenhouse gas emissions; in particular, methane emissions increase by 22%. Methane emissions are also affected by the plant composition, which controls the main emission pathway; small composition changes can induce high emissions variations. Finally, we showed how a change in atmospheric sulfate deposition to wetlands can control the methane emissions. We conclude that modeling coupled chemical, biological, and physical processes helped to describe wetland nutrients dynamics under both climate change and anthropogenic factors.</p>
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere2019JG005437
Pages (from-to)1-20
JournalJournal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
Volume125
Issue number4
Early online date16 Apr 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 Apr 2020

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Mechanistic Analysis of Wetland Biogeochemistry in Response to Temperature, Vegetation, and Nutrient Input Changes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this