Abstract
Examining the global media controversy and debates surrounding the first season of the Netflix series 13 Reasons Why (2017-present), this article focuses on the Australian context and identifies key issues in these debates through a discussion of current media guidelines for responsible portrayals of mental illness and suicide. The article presents a survey of media and academic responses to 13 Reasons Why, including contributions from people with a lived experience of mental illness and suicide. It argues that the way forward for screen portrayals of mental illness and suicide is for screen producers to collaborate with mental health organizations in the development and exhibition of these stories.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 85-100 |
| Journal | The Australasian Journal of Popular Culture |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Mar 2019 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '13 Reasons Why and Netflix's commercial imperative: Disrupting screen portrayals of mental illness and suicide in Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver